Welcome to the home of Donavon West. An independent consultant and Microsoft MVP. I'll be discussung things that are near and dear to me, including life, love, technology and politics. Are you looking for Donavon Stinson? Or possibly even Donavon Frankenreiter? (man, that dude is everywhere!)

This Blog | Home Server Hacks | LiveGadgets.net | The Swatch | VehiCROSS.net | Explore the Studio Space | Chuck Todd Facts

image It looks like things are getting negative. McCain is throwing Ayers name around and Obama is countering with a 13 minute documentary on McCain's involvement in the Keating Five scandal.

Bill Ayers was a radical from the 60's when Obama was just 8 years old. Later in life, Obama and Ayers both sat on the board of The Woods Fund (a non-profit organization). Ayers is currently a professor at the University of Illinois at Chicago.

Charles Keating was convicted of racketeering and fraud in both state and federal court after his Lincoln Savings & Loan collapsed, costing the taxpayers $3.4 billion. McCain intervened on behalf of Charles Keating after receiving political contributions. The McCain family was close to the Keatings. McCain made at least 9 trips on Keating's airplanes, and 3 of those were to Keating's luxurious retreat in the Bahamas with entire McCain family (including the babysitter). McCain's wife and father-in-law also were the largest investors (at $350,000) in a Keating shopping center; the Phoenix New Times called it a "sweetheart deal."

Ayers contributed $200 to Obama's campaign in 2001. Charles Keating contributed more than $112,00 to McCain's campaign in the 1980s.

How do either of these figures affect you? Let's do the math.

Obama's "association" with Bill Ayers has never cost me, or any taxpayer, a cent. John McCain's direct involvement in the "Keating Five" cost taxpayers $3.4 billion in the 1980s and McCain's continued push for deregulation just cost the American taxpayers $800 billion in the recent bailout.

2 comments:

The Bard said on October 15, 2008 at 3:29 PM ...

Amen...what else can I say?

 
Xj Cheng said on October 10, 2015 at 3:08 AM ...

In the 50s,the new Rolex Replicas Submariner archetypal was accessible with cartier replica a alarm adaptation of the Rolex movement.Humans accept that Sean Connery wore the 6538 as James Bond.So collectors attention that archetypal as the alone accurate James Bond Submariner.But added humans accept all Rolex Replicas Submariners after acme guards adapted the aforementioned acumen because rolex replica they weren't alien until 1958.In the 60s,the 1780 was the aboriginal Rolex Submariner to backpack a date complication,appearance the alteration of the Rolex Submariner to a appearance accessory.Abounding defined abide to use Rolex Submariners in underwater environments.Over the next 50 years,the Rolex Replicas Submariner was adapted with omega replica bigger baptize resistance,new movements,and a amount of added changes.But the avant-garde Rolex Replicas Submariner bears little affinity to the beforehand versions,and is an accessible brood of the actual aboriginal Submariners.Swiss Rolex Replicas Submariner watches are an acutely accepted actualization and is calmly one of the a lot of replica louis vuitton apparent Rolex watches on the planet.The Rolex Submariner has appeared in endless James Bond movies,so a lot of humans will apperceive what affectionate of watch it is.

 

Post a Comment